What is Philosophy?
- rjcastillo06
- Sep 17
- 3 min read
Updated: Sep 19
At its root, philosophy (from Greek philo = love, sophia = wisdom) is the disciplined pursuit of knowledge and understanding about the most fundamental aspects of reality, knowledge, values, and reason.
It asks questions like:
What is real? (metaphysics)
How do we know what we know? (epistemology)
How should we live? (ethics)
What is beauty or art? (aesthetics)
How should we reason? (logic)
So, philosophy isn't just abstract - it's the foundation for science, theology, law, politics, and even daily decision-making.
How Can Philosophy Be Used?
Critical Thinking: Spotting flaws, assumptions, and contradictions
Debate: Structuring rational arguments for (or against) God, morality, free will, etc.
Ethics & Politics: Building frameworks for justice, human rights, governance.
Personal Growth: Examining your worldview, why you believe what you do, and refining it.
Basically, philosophy is a toolbox for reasoning and persuasion.
Classic Debate Styles in Philosophy
Philosophers use different logical and argumentative methods. Here are the common ones
Deductive Reasoning
Starts with general premises - reaches a logically certain conclusion.
Example: All humans are mortal. Ryan is human. Therefore, Ryan is mortal
Strength: Very powerful when premises are solid
Weakness: Falls apart if even one premise is questionable
Inductive Reasoning
Observations - general conclusions.
Example: The sun has risen every day in recorded history - Therefore, the sun will rise tomorrow.
Strength: Useful for science and probability.
Weakness: Never gives absolute certainty.
Abductive Reasoning (Inference to the best explanation)
Look at the evidence, then argue what best explains it.
Example: You hear footsteps in your house - best explanation: someone is home.
Strength: Very persuasive in debates about God, because you weigh which worldview best explains existence, morality, consciousness, etc.
Weakness: More subjective since "best explanation" can differ between people.
Dialectic (question/ answer style)
Used by Socrates (Socratic Method). You question assumptions to expose contradictions.
Example: Q. What is justice? A. Doing what is fair. Q. But is it always fair to punish?
Strength: Forces clarity dismantles weak reasoning.
Weakness: More about exposing than proving.
This debate style is generally my favorite to use. I find that it gives me control of the conversation and leverage on where I want to take it. I question to get better clarification and understand my opponent's worldview, then after I have gathered enough information, I press them on the weak points of their claims. I tend to couple this style with Abductive reasoning, think of it as a process of elimination through compare and contrast. I have found it to be very effective.
Which Style is Strongest for Arguing God's Existence?
Deductive works well with arguments like the Cosmological Argument (everything that begins to exist has a cause)
Inductive helps in moral arguments (we see consistent moral behavior in humans, which points beyond survival.)
Abductive is strongest overall: it compares worldviews and asks, "Which explanation makes the most sense of reality?" - Christianity often argues that God best explains consciousness, morality, fine-tuning, and the universe's beginning.
Contrary to what I previously stated, most Christians combo deductive and abductive. I guess I'm the black sheep.
Classic Philosophical Thinkings About God
Here are the big arguments philosophers have used for God:
Cosmological Argument (Aquinas, Leibniz)
Everything that begins has a cause → the universe began → therefore, a First Cause exists (God).
Teleological / Design Argument (Paley, modern fine-tuning)
The universe shows order and fine-tuning → best explained by an intelligent Designer.
Ontological Argument (Anselm, Descartes, later Alvin Plantinga)
If God (the greatest conceivable being) can be conceived, He must exist in reality, not just in thought. (Very debated, but famous.)
Moral Argument (Kant, C.S. Lewis modern version)
Objective morality exists → requires a moral lawgiver → God.
Experiential Argument (Pascal, Kierkegaard)
Human longing, consciousness, and spiritual experience point to God.
Respected Philosophers Who Believed in God
Some of the most influential thinkers were theists:
Plato (c. 427–347 BC) → Believed in a divine reality beyond the material (the Form of the Good).
Aristotle (384–322 BC) → Argued for a “Prime Mover,” pure actuality that causes all motion (proto-theism).
Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD) → Major Christian philosopher, combined Plato with Christian theology.
Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) → Catholic thinker, developed the Five Ways to prove God.
Blaise Pascal (1623–1662) → Wager argument, emphasized faith and reason.
René Descartes (1596–1650) → Used reason to argue for God’s existence.
Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) → Believed morality points to God.
Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) → Father of existentialism, emphasized the leap of faith.
Alvin Plantinga (1932–present) → Leading modern Christian philosopher, developed Reformed epistemology (belief in God can be “properly basic”).




Comments